Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Last chance to contact company that is hosting CAIR fundraiser with top Islamist activist in the US.

Last chance to contact Rosen Hotels & Resorts who is hosting CAIR-Florida fundraiser with keynote speaker Linda Sarsour who is strong Sharia law advocate.

Click on photo to enlarge.
Click here to send your email to Rosen Hotels & Resorts officials to express concern about CAIR-Florida fundraiser and Linda Sarsour.

Please consider posting a message at

to express concern about Rosen Hotels' hosting a fundraiser for terror-Hamas-Muslim Brotherhood linked CAIR with Sharia advocate Linda Sarsour as special guest speaker.

The Rosen Centre Hotel is hosting a fundraising banquet for the Council on American-Islamic Relations Florida affiliate on October 21, 2017 in Orlando Florida.  CAIR-Florida will raise funds at this event to advance its Islamist agenda.
Did Rosen Hotel and Resorts officials agree to host this event knowing the following facts about CAIR, CAIR Florida and the event’s keynote speaker?

CAIR Florida’s banquet keynote speaker is Linda Sarsour.  Linda Sarsour:

•    is a strong advocate for Sharia law in America.  See articles at and Times of Israel. 

•    spoke of jihad toward “fascists and white supremacists and Islamophobes reigning in the White House” during her July 1, 2017 Islamic Society of North America speech.

•    is considered to be the “the most visible Islamist activist in the United States today" by The Investigative Project. 

CAIR Florida has openly defended terrorists in the past.
•    Ahmed Bedier, as director of the Tampa office of the Council on Islamic-American Relations defended Sami Al Arian, who was indicted and plead to federal charges of raising support for a Palestinian terrorist organization. 

•    Ahmed Bedier also spoke on behalf of Youssef Megahed, one of two University of South Florida students who were arrested for allegedly carrying pipe bombs near the naval base in Goose Creek, S.C.  Megahed was arrested later for deportation.

Current CAIR-Florida leader Hassan Shibly told Muslims to defy Customs Agents who are trying to insure public safety for travelers.  Shibly gave these instructions to Muslims.  “When a CBP agent asks you anything beyond identification tell the agent, ‘None of your Damn Business.’” 

The Council on American Islamic Relations has strong ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.  The United Arab Emirates’ ministerial cabinet listed the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as one of 83 banned terrorist organizations on November 15, 2014. In 2007, the United States Department of Justice named CAIR and two other Islamic organizations as “unindicted co-conspirators and/or joint venturers” in a criminal conspiracy to financially support Hamas in United States vs Holy Land Foundation.

More information regarding CAIR's troubling history and agenda is posted at this article.

Rosen Hotels & Resorts certainly has the right to host any group.  You have the same right to voice concern regarding CAIR's history and agenda and choose to spend your money with hoteliers that do not host such groups..

Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send to express concern to Rosen Hotel & Resorts officials about CAIR-Florida fundraiser and Linda Sarsour.

To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the "Send Your Message" button. You may also edit the subject or message text if you wish.
Contact information

Harris Rosen, President

Phil Caronia, General Manager

Frank Santos, VP

Joshua James Rosen
Social Media Analyst


Florida Family Association, Inc.
P.O. Box 46547, Tampa, FL 33646-0105
Telephone 813-690-0060

WATCH: Trudeau Refuses To Reveal When He Learned Of Moneybags Morneau’s “Conflict Of Interest”

WATCH: Trudeau Refuses To Reveal When He Learned Of Moneybags Morneau’s “Conflict Of Interest”

As the controversy surrounding the Finance Minister and the entire Trudeau government continues to escalate, Justin Trudeau is doubling down on dishonesty and diversion, refusing to give any real answers as to when he learned about the Finance Minister using an ethics loophole to avoid putting his shares in a blind trust.

In the video below, watch as Andrew Scheer asks Trudeau a very simple and easy to answer question, which Trudeau pathetically dodges:
If you have trouble viewing the video, click here.


Trudeau trying to claim that Morneau acted with integrity is totally absurd. The government is clearly acting in the interests of a narrow elite, and their talking points are pathetic and empty.
Spencer Fernando

Edmonton Terrorist's Movements Highlight Threat to U.S. Southern Border

Steven Emerson, Executive Director
October 18, 2017

Edmonton Terrorist's Movements Highlight Threat to U.S. Southern Border

by John Rossomando  •  Oct 18, 2017 at 5:02 pm
Be the first of your friends to like this.

Fears about a terrorist using the U.S.-Mexican border as a gateway for an attack have been realized. Evidence shows that Somali Edmonton terrorist Abdulahi Hasan Sharif crossed the U.S.-Mexican border from Tijuana into San Diego at the San Ysidro border crossing on July 12, 2011.
Sharif allegedly hit an Edmonton police officer with a white Chevrolet Malibu on Sept. 30. He then got out of his car and stabbed the officer with a knife. A police manhunt ensued. The attacker then stole a U-Haul and drove it into four pedestrians before police apprehended him.
Investigators found an ISIS flag in his car, but the jihadist group has not claimed responsibility for his attacks.
Canadian press reports indicate that when he entered the U.S in 2011, Sharif lacked valid travel documents and almost immediately ended up in the hands of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). An immigration judge ordered Sharif deported to Somalia. But ICE released him because Somalia lacks a functioning government. He fell of the radar and U.S. authorities were unable to locate him.
He entered Canada in 2012 and obtained refugee status, Canadian officials said. It isn't clear why Canadian officials were unaware of Sharif's deportation from the United States. Privacy laws in both countries could keep that information secret, adding to widespread speculation that he received asylum in the U.S. Asylum applications are confidential, which further complicates the public's right to know.
Reports of Sharif's radicalism, including his open support for ISIS, first surfaced in 2015 after coworkers reported him to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Sharif would rant about how "polytheists" needed to die and how he hated Shiite Muslims, a coworker told the Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC).
The other question is how Sharif got to the U.S.-Mexican border – nearly 10,000 miles from Somalia.
Sharif likely worked with "long haul smugglers," national security expert Todd Bensman theorized in a recent post on his LinkedIn account, using prior court-established smuggling patterns as a baseline. Bensman wrote his Master's thesis for the Naval Postgraduate School on Somali smuggling patterns.
Many Somalis travel from Kenya to South Africa on the first leg of their trip to the U.S. From there they make their way to Brazil and then made his way northward through Latin America until they reach the U.S.-Mexican border.
Sharif's penetration of the U.S.-Mexican border isn't unique, Bensman wrote. He notes that others with ties to Al-Shabaab have also been identified but were apprehended before they could do anything.
The IPT accepts no funding from outside the United States, or from any governmental agency or political or religious institutions. Your support of The Investigative Project on Terrorism is critical in winning a battle we cannot afford to lose. All donations are tax-deductible. Click here to donate online. The Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation is a recognized 501(c)3 organization.  

202-363-8602 - main
202-966-5191 - fax

Can Islam Help Us Prevent More Sexual Abuse Scandals?

Can Islam Help Us Prevent More Sexual Abuse Scandals?

Or has The Independent completely departed from reality?

The UK’s Independent, hitherto generally regarded as not run by insane people, on Sunday ran a piece entitled: “How the teachings of Islam could help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals.” Now on the question of the Independent’s sanity, the jury is decidedly out.
The article is written by Qasim Rashid, which explains a great deal. Rashid is a professional liar, a one-man cottage industry of deception and hypocrisy. He has whitewashed Muhammad’s support for torture and the reality of jihad violence and Sharia oppression; dissembled about the Qur’an’s sanction of deception of unbelievers; lied about the presence of violent passages in the Qur’an; lied about the Qur’an’s sanction of beating disobedient women; lied about the nature of Sharia; called for limitations on the freedom of speech and expression to outlaw behavior and speech some Muslims may find offensive; and lied about Muhammad’s stance toward the persecution of Christians. He has even blamed Christianity for Islam’s death penalty for blasphemy. When challenged about the “facts” he has presented, he (like virtually all other Islamic supremacists) responds with furious ad hominem contempt, but never answers the refutations of his articles on substantive grounds — because, of course, he cannot do so.
In this one, however, Rashid has outdone himself, claiming that “the teachings of Islam could help us prevent more sexual abuse scandals.” This is true in one sense: since Islam doesn’t actually recognize many varieties of sexual abuse as wrongdoing, the scandals would go away. But the abuse wouldn’t.
Rashid contradicts himself right off the bat, saying that “the cancer of sexual abuse against women that we see in Christian majority America is just as prevalent in Muslim majority Pakistan.” Yet later in the article, he claims below that “rather than preach empty dogmatic theories, Islam instead prescribes a proven secular model.” Proven where? In which Islamic country has sexual abuse been eradicated or even lessened by people following Islamic teachings? If not in Islam-besotted Pakistan, then where?
Undaunted by any obligation to provide a rational, evidence-based argument, Rashid continues: “This is where Islamic teachings and Prophet Muhammad’s example provide a solution that no state truly can. And while there are people who don’t believe that sexual abuse is even a problem, some on the left will disagree that accountability to a higher power is a solution….Quran 4:2 first establishes men and women as equal beings. Chapter 4:20 then forbids men from forcing a woman to act against her will, thereby ensuring women maintain autonomy and self-determination.”
Rashid’s Qur’an is one verse off from the standard edition. It’s 4:1 that says “O mankind, fear your Lord, who created you from one soul and created from it its mate and dispersed from both of them many men and women,” and it’s 4:19 that says, “O you who have believed, it is not lawful for you to inherit women by compulsion.” That is not exactly the same thing as forbidding men from forcing women to act against their will; it refers only to forcing them to be given in inheritance.
As always, Rashid’s pieces are notable more for what they leave out than what they put in: Rashid doesn’t mention that the same chapter of the Qur’an says that a man can have sexual relations with “those your right hands possess” (4:3, 4:24), i.e., slave girls whose consent is neither required nor sought.
Rashid adds: “Chapter 4:35 furthermore prevents violence against women by forcing men to control themselves and never resort to physically harming women – preempting physical abuse.”
In reality, Qur’an 4:34 says just the opposite. It doesn’t forbid men to harm women physically. Instead, it says to beat women from whom a man “fears disobedience”: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.”
In case anyone is skeptical that Rashid’s verse citations are one verse off from the standard Qur’anic verse divisions, here is 4:35: “And if you fear dissension between the two, send an arbitrator from his people and an arbitrator from her people. If they both desire reconciliation, Allah will cause it between them. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Acquainted.” Nothing in that verse says anything about not physically harming women.
Digging deeper, Rashid continues:
The Quran further obliges men to provide for a woman’s every financial need, while holding that anything a woman earns is hers alone – preempting financial abuse. And when it comes to the Islamic concept of Hijab, it is men who are first commanded to never gawk at women, and instead guard their private parts and chastity, regardless of how women choose to dress – pre-empting sexual abuse.
In reality, the Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified. And indeed, the assumption behind the hijab is not that a man must not gawk at women, but that women are responsible for making sure that they don’t. And if men gawk anyway, the woman he is gawking at could end up being punished.
Not content to misrepresent the Qur’an, Rashid misrepresents Muhammad:
Prophet Muhammad himself illustrated this point. In a famous incident, a woman described as strikingly beautiful approached the Prophet to seek his guidance on some religious matters. The Prophet’s companion, Al Fadl, began to stare at her because of her beauty. Noting this, the Prophet Muhammad did not scold the woman for her attire, but instead, he “reached his hand backwards, catching Al Fadl’s chin, and turned his face to the other side so that he would not gaze at her”.
Accordingly, the Prophet Muhammad by example demonstrated that the burden of modesty, respect, and combating abuse of women rests on men. Indeed, men must take the lead in stopping such sexual abuse. After all, while the Quran obliges women to dress modestly as a covenant with God, Islam prescribes no punishment whatsoever for women who choose to dress otherwise.
On the contrary, on numerous occasions Prophet Muhammad punished an accused rapist on the testimony of the rape survivor alone. In this environment of gender equity, women in Islam rise to the rank of legal scholars, warriors, entrepreneurs, and philanthropists while lovingly embracing identities as mothers and housewives.
In reality, Muhammad condoned the rape of captive Infidel women: “The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) ‘And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.’” (Sunan Abu Dawud 2150; see also Sahih Muslim 3433) “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.” (Sahih Bukhari 34:432) I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: ‘Give me that girl.’” (Sahih Muslim 4345)
So not only does Muhammad allow the rape, cautioning only against coitus interruptus, but he seizes one of the slave girls for himself.
Qasim Rashid undoubtedly knows the material I am quoting here. He is being deliberately deceptive, to hoodwink people into ignorance and complacency regarding the sexual abuse that is rampant and taken for granted in Muslim countries. In the final analysis, he is on Harvey Weinstein’s side.

Ezra Levant: Jail for graffiti, but not rape?

Europe's New Official History Erases Christianity, Promotes Islam

In this mailing:
  • Giulio Meotti: Europe's New Official History Erases Christianity, Promotes Islam
  • Peter Huessy: Win-Win: How Tax Reform Will Help Defense Spending and the Economy

Europe's New Official History Erases Christianity, Promotes Islam

by Giulio Meotti  •  October 18, 2017 at 5:00 am
  • "The patrons of the false Europe are bewitched by superstitions of inevitable progress. They believe that History is on their side, and this faith makes them haughty and disdainful, unable to acknowledge the defects in the post-national, post-cultural world they are constructing." — The Paris Statement, signed by ten respected European scholars.
  • German Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière's proposal to introduce Muslim public holidays shows that when it comes to Islam, Europe's official "post-Christian" secularism is simply missing in action.
The European Commission ordered Slovakia to redesign its commemorative coins by eliminating the Christian Saints Cyril and Methonius. (Image sources: Coin - European Commission; Bratislava, Slovakia - Frettie/Wikimedia Commons)
A few days ago, some of Europe's most important intellectuals -- including British philosopher Roger Scruton, former Polish Education Minister Ryszard Legutko, German scholar Robert Spaemann and Professor Rémi Brague from the Sorbonne in France -- issued "The Paris Statement". In their ambitious statement, they rejected the "false Christendom of universal human rights" and the "utopian, pseudo-religious crusade for a borderless world". Instead, they called for a Europe based on "Christian roots", drawing inspiration from the "Classical tradition" and rejecting multiculturalism:

Win-Win: How Tax Reform Will Help Defense Spending and the Economy

by Peter Huessy  •  October 18, 2017 at 4:00 am
  • While America's adversaries have been increasing their defense budgets and the power of their armed forces, the United States has been doing the opposite.
  • Although the Senate and House Armed Services Committees passed a bill for 2018 that would exceed President Trump's defense budget request, there is still the problem of the 2011 Budget Control Act, which caps defense spending at an extremely low level. Modernization has been curtailed significantly.
  • Unfortunately, there remains a widely held assumption that unless tax reform is "revenue-neutral," deficits will increase. The trouble with this assumption is that although revenue-neutral tax reform may make the system more efficient or fair, it neither increases government revenue nor generates additional investment in the private sector. The purpose of the new tax-reform plan is to do both: increase revenue and spur economic growth at the same time.
(Image source: U.S. Navy)
One crucial aspect of the new tax reform bill, unveiled by President Donald Trump and the "Big Six" group of Republican tax negotiators at the end of September, is the potentially positive effect it will have on the US defense budget, which is sorely in need of an increase.
The assertion made by former President Barack Obama during his final State of the Union address in January 2016, that the United States spends "more on our military than the next eight nations combined," bolstered the belief that America's national-security needs are beyond being met. However, as a recent Heritage Foundation report reveals, such claims, which have led to the conclusion that the United States allocates an excessive amount to the defense budget, are "disingenuous," as they "give no consideration to the decisions driving defense spending or the factors contributing to costs across national economies."


WEDNESDAY Security Update: Obama Justice Department’s slow-walk investigation of Moscow’s bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering ...

FSM Must Reads + 2012 site
breaking news light
Former Rep. Mike Rogers told The Hill that he was never made aware of anything regarding "Russian nuclear corruption," though many of his fellow lawmakers were concerned about the deal, which was also approved by Hillary Clinton's State Department.

The DOJ continued investigating the matter for nearly four more years, essentially leaving the American public and Congress in the dark about Russian nuclear corruption on U.S. soil during a period when the Obama administration made two major decisions benefiting Putin's commercial nuclear ambitions.

U.S. Army Gen. Votel believes that military pressure will force the Taliban to negotiate: "That's what the object is here is, to use the military pressure to bring them to the table and ... bringing this to some kind of a political negotiation settlement and some kind of peace discussion that takes place." It is Vietnam déjà vu.
donate button pub dom ok

Reviewed by
Seventeen years since the start of the jihad-intifada, sixteen years after 9/11, Western societies are challenged to understand the connection between antisemitism, antizionism, and 21st century jihad conquest.

In an indisputable act of jihad by a Cairo Muslim named Ahmed Saayed Al Sunbaty wielding a sword in the streets of Al Marg in Egypt's capital city, two Orthodox priests, Father Beeman Muftah and Monsignor Samaan, became the targets of this jihadist.

As activists stumble over themselves to locate Confederate statues to topple or an American flag and national anthem to disrespect, certain aspects undermining their racial claims, past and present, largely go unaddressed.

Karl Marx said, "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce."

Qatar's embrace of the Muslim Brotherhood, funding of Hamas, and propagation of Al Jazeera's pro-terror broadcasts serves to increase terrorist attacks against U.S. forces and our allies in the region, particularly Israel, KSA and Egypt.

The escalating threat has resulted from 25 years of bipartisan foreign policy failure

I am directing my administration to work closely with Congress and our allies to address the deal's many serious flaws so that the Iranian regime can never threaten the world with nuclear weapons.

Surprisingly, the Trump Justice Department refuses to disclose the talking points developed by the Obama Justice Department to help it respond to press inquiries about the controversial tarmac meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton at Phoenix Airport.
donate button pub dom ok

FSM video  picks + 2012 site
russia site photo
·  TUCKER: Media Does Not Own Up To False Stories on Russia
·  FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before uranium deal
·  TUCKER: "What's Feminist Economics?"
·  President Trump: "Not Too Many" Obama Administration Policies Will Be Kept in Place
·  People's Party wins Austrian election with a tough stance on immigration and border control. (Monica Crowley)
·  President Trump Delivers Remarks to the 2017 Values Voter Summit
·  Puerto Rico Delegate: Everything That We've Asked For, President Trump Has Provided
·  Rep. Jim Jordan: ObamaCare subsidies were clearly illegal
·  Tillerson "Not Going To Dignify" "Moron" Question From CNN's Jake Tapper
donate button pub dom ok
REMINDER: Please "like" our Facebook page:
Don't forget to share some tweets!


donate now _button_blue

As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, The Family Security Foundation relies upon the thoughtfulness and (tax-deductible!) generosity of visitors like you.

donate now _button_blue
10 year FSM Anniversary
We certainly couldn't do it without you!

Checks may be sent here:

Family Security Foundation, Inc.
2020 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., #298
Washington, D.C. 20006 

Look Where ISIS Has Been Discovered the Last Month

Look Where ISIS Has Been Discovered the Last MonthFrom Belgium to Morocco, Russian and IranRead
Muslim Brotherhood Deepens Its Ties on Capitol HillDetailed notes from a Brotherhood gathering made publicRead and Help
Mandatory Life Sentence for NY, NJ BomberPolice believe he was a radicalized 'lone wolf'Read
US Launches First Anti-ISIS Strike in Yemen; Kills 50The first US strike against ISIS in Yemen to dateRead
Double Standard for Extremism on UK Campuses?Why was the Christian Union banned but hate preachers allowed? Read
Readers Write
“Those who hide terrorists should be charged as such ...”
“I think the point of 'liberal values' in this thread is being missed. It is not whether the burka should be banned because it can conceal a terrorist etc. It is whether 'liberals' are truly being 'liberal' in the defense of the burka. I say it is hypocrisy because to be truly liberal you would admit that these customs that conceal the female are all part of the shame mentality that keeps women as an inferior powerless subclass. When we see liberals fighting for the 'burka' as a human right, they are revealing the shallowness of their own so called stand on women's equality, you can't have it both ways.”
The Clarion Project is a registered 501(c)(3).Donations are tax deductible.