|
In this mailing:
by Peter Pry and Peter
Huessy • February 29, 2016 at 5:30 am
- A careful
technical reading of the DoD report clearly confirms that North
Korea can strike the U.S. mainland with nuclear missiles right now.
But the casual or non-expert reader can get the false impression
that President Obama was right to assert that there is no nuclear
missile threat from North Korea.
- Given this
overwhelming evidence of North Korea's ability to strike the U.S.
mainland, how strange that most major news outlets have never
reported that North Korea already has nuclear-armed missiles
that can strike the U.S.
- The DoD report
was inexplicably silent about North Korea's current nuclear and
missile capability, which could kill millions of Americans in an EMP
attack -- as warned by both the 2004 and 2008 Congressional EMP
Commission reports.
- The EMP
Commission and the authors of this article believe that North Korea
tested what the Russians call a Super-EMP weapon.
- It is time to
stop wishful thinking -- that everything is fine, that diplomacy
will work -- and to face reality.
- Space-based
missile defenses will offer a realistic prospect of rendering
nuclear missile threats obsolete, thus neutralizing the growing
nuclear missile threats to the U.S. from North Korea, Iran, China,
and Russia.
Kim Jong Un, the "Supreme Leader" of North
Korea, supervises the April 22 test-launch of a missile from a submerged
platform. (Image source: KCNA)
The mainstream media and their stable of "experts"
consistently underestimate North Korea's missile and nuclear weapon
capabilities. The gap between how the media report on the North Korean
nuclear missile threat and the reality of the threat has become so wide
as to be dangerous.
In the aftermath of North Korea's latest nuclear test on January 6,
2016, for instance, and its launch of a mock satellite on February 7,
2016, the American people were told that North Korea has not miniaturized
a nuclear warhead for delivery by missile nor could the missile strike
the U.S. with any accuracy.
Mirren Gidda, for example, writing in Newsweek, inexplicably
claims "International experts doubt that North Korea has
manufactured nuclear weapons small enough to fit on a missile."
Yet this commonplace assertion that North Korea does not have
nuclear-armed missiles is simply untrue.
by Nima Gholam Ali Pour
• February 29, 2016 at 4:00 am
- That Sweden is
a "humanitarian superpower" is a myth that needs exposing
once and for all. The recent migration wave to Sweden has made some
people poor and others very, very rich. It is all about money, and
it is about winners and losers.
- If liberal
journalists outside Sweden believe that rape is humanitarian, then
Sweden has a humanitarian migration policy.
- Meanwhile,
thousands of "unaccompanied refugee children" are
disappearing. and no one knows where they are.
- There is
nothing "noble" in Sweden's migration policy -- far from
being a good example of how a migration policy should function, it
is a disaster, and its final result is chaos, conflict, and
corruption.
The biggest private company running asylum
accommodations is owned by Bert Karlsson (left). In 2015, his company
billed Swedish taxpayers $23.9 million. His homes require asylum seekers
to buy their own toilet paper, apparently despite having agreed with the
Migration Agency to provide asylum seekers with toilet paper, sanitary
napkins and diapers. Wafa Issa (right) is head of the Migration Agency
for the Stockholm region. She also runs a private company that is paid to
provide foster homes to unaccompanied refugee children.
When you talk to journalists from the U.S. or the UK, they often
seem to think that Sweden is a humanitarian superpower that has received
refugees because the Swedish government is following some ideology based
on doing good deeds.
That Sweden is a humanitarian superpower, eager to lead by example,
is a myth that needs exposing once and for all. The recent migration wave
to Sweden has made some people poor and others very, very rich.
Every day one reads news in Sweden about the winners and the losers
in the migration industry. One of the winners in Sweden's migration
industry is ICA Bank. In November 2015, it invoiced the Swedish Migration
Agency $8 million for providing asylum seekers prepaid cards. For every
cash withdrawal, ICA Bank takes a $2 fee, and for every prepaid card
activated, it takes $21. ICA Bank won the contract without any
competition; its contract with the Migration Agency extends to March
2017.
|
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment