Friday, April 25, 2014

Eye on Iran: Iranians Deliver Rouhani's First Political Defeat








Join UANI  
 Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter View our videos on YouTube
   
Top Stories

AFP: "Eight months after taking office, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani has suffered his first major political defeat, with the public overwhelmingly brushing aside appeals to forgo direct government aid. The 455,000-rial ($14) monthly handout scheme, initiated in December 2010 by Rouhani's predecessor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is part of broader economic reforms aimed at overhauling the country's massive subsidy system. The reform -- which phases out parts of remaining subsidies on energy, utility bills and basic food costs -- is forecast in this year's budget to save the cash-starved government $18 billion. Encouraged by economists as a way of regulating Iran's economy, which is stretched thin with debilitating sanctions and mismanagement, the second phase of the plan started Friday with petrol prices being raised as much as 75 percent. The bid to curb expenditure under the separate handout scheme, however, appears to have failed. The Rouhani administration for weeks ran an aggressive media campaign seeking to persuade the most affluent of Iran's 77-million population, and some of the middle class, to waive the cash payments... But on Wednesday it was announced that 73 million people -- 95 percent -- had asked to receive the money, amounting to a near $1-billion monthly bill. The low rate of dropouts was mocked in conservative circles, and even moderates and reformists expressed criticism." http://t.uani.com/1fe9MJE

AP: "Iran cut a portion of fuel subsidies Friday, nearly doubling some prices at the pump as part of a second round of cuts delayed since 2012. The dramatic measure, which went into effect at midnight, will test public support for moderate President Hassan Rouhani in a nation battered by inflation and economic sanctions imposed over Iran's contested nuclear program. Subsidies have kept the cost of gasoline artificially low for consumers in OPEC-member Iran, and were blamed for making petrol cheaper than bottled mineral water. The slash aims to release government money for production and infrastructural projects in order to improve efficiency and bolster the economy. Under the new pricing scheme, each car on the road would see its monthly, 60-liter (15.85-gallon) reduced-cost allowance jump to 7,000 rials (22 cents) per liter from 4,000 rials (12 cents). That works out to about 83 cents a gallon under the new pricing structure, compared to 45 cents under the former. Every liter after that will cost 10,000 rials (31 cents), up from 7,000 rials. That's a rise of $1.17 a gallon from 83 cents a gallon. Taxi drivers have a higher monthly ration of 500 liters (132.09 gallons)." http://t.uani.com/1nMLyWT

Fox News: "Despite their human rights records, the United Nations has elected the Islamic Republic of Iran, Cuba, Sudan and several other repressive regimes to influential committees charged with promoting human rights. Human rights activists see this as a major setback in their campaign to end abuse and to create open and healthy societies. The Economic and Social Council, a U.N. body based in New York, elected Iran to a four-year term on its Commission on the Status of Women, the world's top intergovernmental organization dedicated to promoting women's rights. Tehran also won a seat on the 19-nation Committee on NGOs (non-government organizations), a position that enables Tehran to champion and silence human rights organizations, depending on their views. The move prompted U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power to tweet: 'Yet again #Iran ran unopposed & was elected to Commission on Status of Women. Given record on women's & human rights, this is an outrage.'" http://t.uani.com/1lbHdg9
      
Nuclear Program & Negotiations

Trend: "Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Iran's missile program has never been in the negotiation agenda with Group 5+1, IRNA reported. Speaking with Russian TV network 'Russia Today' on Wednesday, Lavrov said that Iran's missile program has never been an issue in the framework of Iran and Group 5+1 negotiation on nuclear program. He added that Iran's missile program issue in not mentioned in Geneva agreement between Iran and Group 5+1 last November." http://t.uani.com/1htKKVM

AP: "Iran's foreign minister is urging the West not to miss the opportunity President Hassan Rouhani poses in talks over the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. The Twitter account of Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, had a message Friday saying progress could have been made in negotiations 10 years ago. The message added: 'Rouhani offers an opportunity that must not be missed: too much is at stake.' The message referenced a recent profile of Rouhani written by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Mohamed ElBaradei for Time magazine's 100 Most Influential People list." http://t.uani.com/1jLixa7

Sanctions Enforcement & Impact

The National: "When Alireza Amoei's new car finally arrived, a year late, it was missing a few parts. There was no spare tyre and no stereo. He complained to the company from which he ordered his Peugeot 206, Iran Khodro, the largest automobile manufacturer in the Middle East. After much back and forth, he was told last month the parts were not available. 'The only excuse for such a long delay in delivery was lack of parts due to sanctions,' said the 41-year-old physician, as he refilled in a Tehran petrol station. Iran once had a vibrant car culture, but years of international sanctions have had a devastating effect on the local automobile industry. Production has dropped by more than half since 2011 - down to 626,110 vehicles in 2013 compared to 1.6 million two years earlier... 'When Peugeot first left, we froze. It took us a year to produce our first Iranian part,' said Farzad Mansouri, the head of the assembly line of the Peugeot 206. 'It was not easy. It was a disaster for us. But now we are completely independent.'" http://t.uani.com/QLricL

Human Rights

Reuters: "Iran on Thursday rejected U.S. criticism of its election to the United Nations' committee on non-governmental organizations (NGOs), saying Washington's rebuke came from 'baseless accusations' and violated the spirit of cooperation needed at the world body. U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power on Wednesday said, 'The unopposed candidacy of Iran, where authorities regularly detain human rights defenders, subjecting many to torture, abuse, and violations of due process, is a particularly troubling outcome.' Hamid Babaei, spokesman for Iran's U.N. mission in New York, vehemently rejected Power's remarks. 'Iran categorically rejects baseless accusations raised in the statement of (Power) regarding status of human rights and civil liberties in the Islamic Republic of Iran and find these assertions both unconstructive, obstructive and against the spirit of cooperation between sovereign member states,' he said." http://t.uani.com/QLhcJ4

ICHRI: "A film clip shown on Iran's state television denying the well-documented brutal assault on political prisoners at Evin Prison Ward 350 by security guards on April 17, 2014 has been described as 'shameless' by the brother of one of the prisoners. The film, broadcast a few days after the attack, claims that no violence was used against the inmates, in direct contradiction to eyewitness accounts detailing grievous injuries to the prisoners. Ahmad Reza Haeri, the brother of Saeed Haeri, a human rights activist imprisoned at Ward 350, told the International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran that the families of the political prisoners plan to file an official protest with the supervisory board of the state radio and television organization, the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB). 'This film has caused tremendous distress among the relatives of the political prisoners,' Ahmad said." http://t.uani.com/1lbGpHS

ICHRI: "In a public letter to President Hassan Rouhani, 421 civil and political activists in Iran called on him to investigate the assault on political prisoners in Evin Prison's Ward 350, which has now been called 'Black Thursday.' 'As members of civil society and political activists, we request that you take a stand against tyranny and injustice against the children of this land within the framework of the law and with the powers you have received by the vote of the people and make an effort to empathize with the victims of these incidents,' they wrote in the letter. The letter notes that the president is constitutionally obligated to protect citizens' rights. 'You can instruct the Supreme National Security Council [headed by Rouhani] to form a special truth commission to investigate the April 17 incidents in Evin,' the letter stated. 'By doing so you would be responding to the public's demands and removing a tumor before it grows and becomes deadly,' it added." http://t.uani.com/1lbGA66

Domestic Politics

Trend: "In order to support its struggling auto industry, Iran has decided on a new move and will start implementing it starting from today. The country's central bank will allow the auto industry companies to purchase foreign currency by an official rate of 25,500 rials per each USD, the official IRNA news agency reported on April 24. Iranian carmakers, while manufacturing the cars inside Iran, still need to import certain raw materials from other countries, which, in most cases, accept only USD. Previously, the carmakers in Iran had to purchase the foreign currency based on the free market rate which is significantly higher than official rate. For example, the USD was sold for 33,290 rials at Iran's free market on April 24." http://t.uani.com/1mH392r

Opinion & Analysis

Amos Yadlin in YnetNews: "Those of us who only read the headlines on news websites this week might have received the impression that Iran is prepared to make significant concessions in regards to its nuclear plan, and that the Iranian military nuclear program crisis may already be behind us. One headline announced that 'Iran has neutralized half of its stockpile of higher-enriched uranium.' Another headline reported that the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Ali Salehi, declared that Iran and the world powers had reached an agreement on the technical changes which would reduce the production of the heavy water reactor in Arak - a reactor which would not be able to produce plutonium for a nuclear weapon after being completed.  Iran is allegedly showing willingness to compromise on the two routes leading to the development of a nuclear weapon: The uranium enrichment route and the plutonium production route. This is precisely the message Tehran is hoping to assimilate in the West. But a look through the fine print in the published reports and a better understanding of the entire Iranian nuclear program lead to a completely different picture. Cutting the stockpile, for example, is not an Iranian concession but simply an implementation of the Iranian commitment as part of the interim agreement signed in November 2013. Tehran agreed to cut its stockpile of 20% enriched uranium, which is not even sufficient for one bomb, in order to preserve the low-level stockpile of the element (3.5%) which is sufficient for at least six bombs. This is the Iranian strategy in the negotiations with the world powers: To preserve and maximize their achievements and to minimize the concessions. So instead of accepting the powers' demand to alter the Arak reactor so that it would not be able to produce fissile material for a bomb, Iran is offering technical changes which will reduce the production ability, but will not abolish it. Such technical changes are reversible in case of an Iranian decision to violate the agreement. Iran is trying to portray itself as a country prepared to make fundamental concessions, but at the same time it is preserving the core abilities in both routes it is developing for a nuclear weapon. The American suggestion is to focus on the demand for a tight and unprecedented system of inspection of the Iranian nuclear program as part of a final agreement. This demand is necessary in order to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon in the future, but it is insufficient. The international inspection systems are not perfect and have always known to fail. They already failed in the past to discover on time the efforts made by Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Syria and Iran to secretly develop a military nuclear program. These systems can cease to exist in case of a unilateral Iranian decision - like what happened with North Korea. There is a need, therefore, to agree on parameters which will keep Iran away from the bomb by extending the time required to develop a nuclear weapon if it decides to expel the inspectors or quits the Non-Proliferation Treaty. As part of this demand, the powers must demand that Iran will dissolve most of the centrifuges and leave a symbolic number of non-advanced centrifuges. They must demand that the uranium enrichment stockpile in Iran will be limited to a low level and symbolic amount (less than the amount required for one bomb). They must also demand the dismantlement of the enrichment site inside a mountain near Qom, which aims to guarantee a protected site immune to a quick breakthrough towards a bomb. They must demand that the Arak reactor will be altered so that it would not be used for military purposes and demand an answer to the open questions regarding the military dimensions of the Iranian nuclear program. They must also determine that the agreement will be approved by the Security Council and will be valid for many years - a period which will guarantee a real change in the Iranian strategic conduct." http://t.uani.com/1mLua7m

Ilan Berman in WT: "In the current debate over the Iranian bomb, the White House is staying quiet about its concerns over the regime's progress on missile development. It's the dog that isn't barking. Since last Fall, Washington and European capitals have been embroiled in a protracted bout of nuclear diplomacy with Iran. In Washington, as elsewhere, hopes still run high that this effort will help curb the threat posed by Tehran's atomic ambitions. To do so, however, any diplomatic deal will need not only to limit Iran's capability to make nuclear weapons, but also its ability to deliver them. On that score, Tehran is most definitely not cooperating with the West. On April 16, Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan publicly ruled out the possibility that his government would ever put its ballistic-missile arsenal on the global negotiating table. 'Iran's missiles are not up for discussion under any circumstances,' Mr. Dehghan told the country's official Fars news agency. 'Iran's missiles are only our concern ... . We don't accept any intervention from anybody on this issue.' Mr. Dehghan's comments were a broadside aimed squarely at the U.S. State Department, which had tentatively raised the issue of delivery systems in its recent diplomatic discussions with Tehran. Washington's concerns are certainly well-placed. In recent years, in tandem with its nuclear advances, the Islamic republic has carried out significant, sustained work on its ballistic-missile arsenal. According to U.S. intelligence assessments, Iran is already the most formidable missile power in the Middle East, and ballistic missiles would be its delivery system of choice if it were to field a nuclear weapon. The mainstay of Iran's arsenal is the Shahab-3, a medium-range missile unveiled publicly more than a decade ago. When inducted into service, the Shahab-3 was a liquid-fuel missile with an estimated range of about 750 miles. However, in recent years, the Iranian regime has expanded the range, accuracy and payload of the Shahab and its variants. Today, the Shahab class of missiles is estimated to be nuclear-capable and have a range of between 900 and 1,200 miles - putting all of Israel, the north of India and parts of Eastern Europe within striking distance of the Islamic republic. These capabilities are just part of the larger picture. In 2005, Iran became the first space-faring nation in the Muslim world when it successfully launched a surveillance satellite into orbit from the missile base in Plesetsk, Russia. Since then, the Iranian regime has racked up a number of additional successful launches, demonstrating that it has a sustained - and successful - space program. While these efforts appear to be civilian in nature, the potential military applications can't be ignored. The same rocket booster used to place a payload into low-earth orbit can be married to a two-stage ballistic missile to create one of intercontinental range. Iran, in other words, is building the capability to transition rapidly from being a regional missile power to being a global one with the capability to hold at risk Western Europe - and beyond. Moreover, it could do so very, very soon. Last year, a study of global missile threats by the National Air and Space Intelligence Center assessed that Iran 'could develop and test an ICBM capable of reaching the United States by 2015.' All this means that ballistic missiles need to be part of any serious discussion about limiting Iran's strategic capabilities. That's precisely the conversation Iranian officials are hoping to avoid, because they understand full well that their country's global status is inexorably linked not only to its nuclear capabilities, but also to maintaining the means to deliver them." http://t.uani.com/1htJHoV

Yaakov Amidror in JPost: "Ostensibly, official US policy on Iran's nuclear program is clear: The US will not allow Iran to produce a nuclear bomb. Moreover, US President Barack Obama has said that, for this purpose, 'all options are on the table' - implying a military option as well. In addition, according to many reports in American newspapers, Obama has ordered the development of diversified US military capabilities with which to attack Iranian nuclear facilities, far beyond what existed in the previous administration - providing further evidence of the president's seriousness. But many people do not understand the meaning behind the vague statement, 'We will not allow Iran to manufacture a nuclear bomb.' When will this happen? Who will decide that this is the time for action? How? What does 'manufacture' mean? Robert Einhorn seeks to answer these questions in a 56-page comprehensive paper, just published by the Brookings Institution, titled 'Preventing a Nuclear-Armed Iran: Requirements for a Comprehensive Nuclear Agreement.' This paper cannot be ignored, since until a few months ago Einhorn was one of the top officials on Iran in the Obama administration, and he is very knowledgeable on the topic. (Einhorn was the secretary of state's special adviser for nonproliferation and arms control. During the Clinton administration, he was assistant secretary for nonproliferation.) In addition to analyzing Iran's intentions toward nuclear weapons and discussing the principal issues in the negotiations, Einhorn outlines the key requirements for an acceptable comprehensive agreement that, in his view, 'would prevent Iran from having a rapid nuclear breakout capability and deter a future Iranian decision to build nuclear weapons.' According to Einhorn, the essence of an agreement between Iran and the P5+1 could be as follows: Iran will retain the capability to produce the material necessary for a bomb (full fuel cycle), so theoretically it will be able to produce a bomb should it decide to do so. But the agreement that the US should try to reach will include the most sophisticated and exacting controls and monitoring, which will immediately spot any breakthrough in Iran's nuclear program. The capability that Iran will be permitted under the agreement will be greatly reduced compared with its current capability (for example, far fewer centrifuges), so that from the moment of the breach and its identification, the US will have enough time to respond with very severe sanctions, and with force too, if necessary. In order to dissuade the Iranians from advancing toward a bomb, it will be made clear to them by various means that Iran will pay a heavy price for violating the agreement, and that the US will respond quickly in the event of a violation to prevent any possibility of the Iranians reaping the rewards of the violation. Einhorn proposes a new world of 'deterrence' - not against the use of nuclear weapons, but against producing nuclear weapons. This deterrence is needed because this approach would permit the Iranians to keep the capability to produce a nuclear weapon. The West (and Israel) will have to live with this Iranian production capability, because it is a fact that, Einhorn says, cannot be change. In short, violating the agreement will be cause for penalizing Iran, not the fact that Iran will have the capability to produce a nuclear weapon. In my opinion, Israel should oppose such an agreement for three reasons." http://t.uani.com/1ntKwS2

UN Watch: "The United Nations today elected the Islamic Republic of Iran and more than a dozen other repressive regimes to top committees charged with protecting women's rights and with overseeing the work of human rights organizations, according to an exclusive report by UN Watch, a non-governmental Geneva-based human rights group. Human rights activists are expressing outrage. 'Today is a black day for human rights,' said Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch. 'By empowering the perpetrators over the victims, the UN harms the cause of human rights, betrays its founding principles, and undermines its own credibility.' 'Civil society loses as repressive states win election,' said the International Service for Human Rights (ISHR). Despite the sharp condemnation of Iran's human rights record by UN chief Ban Ki-moon -- who recently reported how women in Iran are 'subject to discrimination, entrenched both in law and in practice' and how 'women's rights activists continue to face arrest and persecution' --  the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) in New York today elected Iran to a four-year term on its 45-nation Commission on the Status of Women, the principal intergovernmental body dedicated to protecting women's rights. Equitorial Guinea was among other dictatorships also named to the global gender equality panel. Meanwhile, in a separate vote today, the UN additionally rewarded Iran by making the regime a member of its powerful 19-nation Committee on NGOs, a coveted position because it allows governments to silence criticism by acting as the gatekeeper and overseer of all human rights groups that seek to work inside the world body. Other egregious human rights abusers elected to the influential panel include Azerbaijan, China, Cuba, slave-holding Mauritania, Russia, and Sudan, whose leader, President Omar al-Bashir, is wanted by the ICC for genocide. All were deemed 'not free' in the 2014 annual survey by Freedom House. Burundi, Guinea, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Turkey, Venezuela, flagged as problematic and only 'partly free' by Freedom House, were also elected." http://t.uani.com/PA7loy

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment