Friday, May 31, 2013

Eye on Iran: US: Iran Support for Global Terror Surged in 2012










For continuing coverage follow us on Twitter and join our Facebook group.
  
Top Stories

AP: "Iran last year boosted its support for global terrorism to levels not seen for two decades, the Obama administration said Thursday as it released its annual report on international trends in extremist violence. The report said the core elements of al-Qaida in Afghanistan and Pakistan are headed for defeat but stressed that the network's various affiliates remain severe threats to the U.S. The State Department's 'Country Reports on Terrorism' for 2012 left unchanged the U.S. list of 'state sponsors of terrorism.' Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria remain on that blacklist, although Iran was singled out as the worst offender and Syria was taken to task for the ongoing brutal crackdown on opponents of President Bashar Assad's regime. The report said 2012 was 'notable in demonstrating a marked resurgence of Iran's state sponsorship of terrorism.' That sponsorship has been largely carried out through the Quds Force of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and the militant Shiite Hezbollah movement, Iran's ally and proxy in Lebanon, it said. 'Iran and Hezbollah's terrorist activity has reached a tempo unseen since the 1990s, with attacks plotted in Southeast Asia, Europe, and Africa,' it said. Those included an attack on a bus carrying Israeli tourists in Bulgaria that killed six, as well as thwarted strikes in India, Thailand, Georgia and Kenya." http://t.uani.com/137T4lH

WashPost: "An Iranian American used-car salesman from Texas at the center of a bizarre plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States was sentenced Thursday in federal court in Manhattan to 25 years in prison. Mannsor Arbabsiar, 58, had pleaded guilty in October to a charge of murder-for-hire and two counts of conspiracy for his role in attempting to orchestrate the 2011 bombing assassination of Adel al-Jubeir while the ambassador dined at Cafe Milano, an upscale Georgetown restaurant. Prosecutors said Arbabsiar was recruited by a cousin who was a senior official in the Quds Force, which in 2007 the Treasury Department designated a terrorist supporter, according to court papers. The group is part of the Revolutionary Guard Corps, which is closely aligned with Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei." http://t.uani.com/16vD9ST

AP: "The U.S. issued sanctions Thursday against Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's deputy chief of staff and more than 50 other Iranian government officials for alleged human rights abuses, while making it easier for Americans to export advanced communications equipment to Iranian civilians. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the U.S. is trying to help Iranians exercise freedom of expression, even as they face Internet blockages and a lack of communications access in the run-up to Iran's June 14 presidential election. The U.S. says it is part of an effort by Tehran to stifle dissent. Thursday's sanctions target an Iranian intelligence unit responsible for blocking information and senior Khamenei aide Asghar Mir-Hejazi. Mir-Hejazi is culpable in violent crackdowns on Iranians, Psaki said. She said almost 60 other officials involved in abuses also were added to a U.S. blacklist." http://t.uani.com/19sQjiq
 
Election Repression Toolkit    
Sanctions

WashPost: "The Obama administration launched an offensive against Iranian censorship on Thursday, announcing measures intended to help ordinary Iranians acquire smartphones and computer software to thwart government eavesdroppers. The key step, a 'general license' issued by the Treasury Department, gives private companies permission to sell communications equipment to Iranians, overriding trade restrictions that had limited legitimate sales of phones and computer gear to the Islamic Republic. U.S. officials said the action, coming two weeks before Iran's presidential elections, would make it easier for ordinary Iranians to obtain unfiltered news or to talk freely to people outside the country. 'Freedom of speech, assembly and expression are universal human rights,' David S. Cohen, the Treasury undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, said in announcing the move. 'We will use all the tools at our disposal... to help the Iranian people exercise these basic rights.'" http://t.uani.com/11bVvQU

Ars Technica: "On Thursday, the Obama Administration lifted digital sanctions that for more than two decades have prevented companies that do business in the US from also selling or distributing digital goods-including mobile phones, hosting services, VPNs, and software updates-to Iran. 'It remains to be seen whether the policy of increasing access to these products and services will actually lead to enhanced communications by the Iranian people,' Douglas Jacobson, an international trade lawyer, told Ars. 'There certainly is a large demand for US origin telecommunications products. However, there are many other practical issues, including the ability to pay for the products, hardware, and services authorized, since financial transactions with Iran are very difficult due to the wide array of financial sanctions imposed on Iran by the US and other countries. Also, it remains to be seen whether the government of Iran will even allow such hardware to be imported.'" http://t.uani.com/19sUISp

Bloomberg: "Japan's crude imports from Iran slumped 96 percent in April from a year ago, as sanctions aimed at halting the Middle Eastern country's atomic program limited insurance for transportation of the cargoes. Oil purchases from Iran for the month dropped to 36,005 kiloliters, or about 7,550 barrels a day, compared with 902,115 kiloliters in April 2012, according to data today from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Imports fell 97 percent from 1.39 million kiloliters in March, the data showed. Japan's total crude purchases shrank 6.2 percent in April to 17.59 million kiloliters, the trade ministry said. Oil-product imports declined 17 percent to 2.54 million kiloliters, while oil-product exports rose 16 percent to 2.42 million kiloliters. The Japanese government began providing sovereign insurance to tanker operators that import Iranian oil after European Union sanctions were introduced last year as an attempt to persuade Iran to halt its nuclear program. The sanctions barred coverage for 95 percent of the global fleet because London-based underwriters arrange most of the insurance. Japan's oil buyers reduced their purchases in April to ration out the government coverage and avoid using it up early in the year, according to Akitsugu Takahashi, the executive director for retail fuel sales at JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corp., Japan's biggest refiner." http://t.uani.com/Zy9hCr

Terrorism

AP: "Soldiers in northern Nigeria uncovered a hidden arms cache that authorities believe belonged to members of the Lebanese political party and militant movement Hezbollah, the military and secret police said Thursday... 'The arms and ammunition were targeted at facilities of Israel and Western interest in Nigeria, however, the security agencies are making frantic efforts to unveil the true situation,' the military's statement read. 'At the end of investigation, all those involved will be prosecuted.' ... Iran, which backs Hezbollah, has recently been implicated in two incidents in Nigeria. An Iranian and his Nigerian accomplice were sentenced to five years in prison earlier this month over trying to smuggle a weapons shipment heading to Gambia through Nigeria. U.S. authorities and the United Nations have linked the Iranian to his nation's Quds Force, part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. In February, Nigerian authorities broke up what they described as an Iranian-backed group that was gathering intelligence about locations frequented by Americans and Israelis, as well as making lists of famous people for possible attacks. Those arrested in the operation have yet to face charges." http://t.uani.com/11t7RDf

Opinion & Analysis

UANI Outreach Coordinator Bob Feferman in Algemeiner: "In October 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave a speech in Chicago titled 'Quarantine the Aggressor,' in which he challenged Americans and the world to take action to prevent the outbreak of war. Today, as we face the challenge of Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons, it is important to ask how we can implement Roosevelt's vision of peaceful conflict resolution. In the speech, Roosevelt warned: 'The peace-loving nations must make a concerted effort in opposition to those violations of treaties... which today are creating a state of international anarchy and instability from which there is no escape through mere isolation or neutrality'. He identified the key to preserving peace as '... a return to a belief in the pledged word, in the value of a signed treaty.' In 2002, Iran was found to be in violation of its treaty obligation under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT), by hiding a uranium enrichment program from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).  In 2006, the U.N Security Council issued the first of four resolutions requiring Iran to cease all uranium enrichment activity. Since 2006, Iran has continued to act in total defiance of the U.N Security Council and has not only continued to enrich uranium, but greatly expanded its enrichment facilities. According to the IAEA, Iran now has more than 12,000 spinning centrifuges. Moreover, Iran not only violates the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, through its extensive support for terrorist organizations- including Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Iraqi insurgents and the Taliban in Afghanistan- Iran is in fundamental violation of it obligations to the Charter of the United Nations... Clearly, a regime that ignores the '...value of a signed treaty' cannot be entrusted with the ultimate weapon of terror: the atomic bomb. Although the economic sanctions imposed on Iran by the Security Council are weak and ineffective (thanks to Russia and China), as Americans we can be proud that the U.S. government has imposed much tougher ones. Today, U.S companies and their foreign subsidiaries are prohibited from doing any business in Iran except for humanitarian reasons. In addition, over 20 states have adopted laws divesting their public pension funds from companies working in Iran's energy sector. Seven states have adopted contracting legislation that prohibits companies working in Iran's energy sector from signing government contracts. Opinion polls also show that a majority of American people understand that a nuclear-armed Iran that sponsors terrorism would pose a clear threat to American national security and world peace. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of America's foreign friends and allies.  Beyond the effective embargo of European Union on Iranian oil, hundreds of major multinational companies, like Ericsson, LG, and Lufthansa, continue business as usual in Iran. Ending this corporate support is critical to pressuring the regime to consider halting its nuclear weapons program." http://t.uani.com/115cMub

Con Coughlin in The Daily Telegraph: "The other factor that weighs greatly in Assad's favour in his bid for survival is the support he is receiving from Iran's Revolutionary Guards. Much is being made of the recent shipment of Russian S-300 anti-aircraft batteries to Syria to protect the regime from possible Nato air strikes. But the real game-changer on the ground has been the training and equipment provided by Iran's Revolutionary Guards, who have helped to train thousands of Syrians to fight on the regime's behalf. As I revealed last September, an estimated 150 Revolutionary Guards were sent to Syria by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad after Iran decided it could not let its most important regional ally succumb to the rebel forces which, backed by al-Qaeda sympathisers, were at that time threatening to overrun the regime. Now the Iranians' efforts are starting to pay dividends, and the latest military assessments suggest that the thousands of Syrian fighters who have undergone training at the hands of the Revolutionary Guards are now having a profound effect on the course of the fighting. As I reported earlier this week, these troops, having recently graduated from secret training camps staffed by 150 Iranian military advisers, are now taking a lead role in attacking the rebels. The Assad regime is also receiving support from the Iranian-controlled Hizbollah militia based in southern Lebanon, particularly in the current battle for the town of Qusayr. As a result pro-Assad forces have notched up a number of recent successes, which include driving the rebels from the previously held positions on the outskirts of Damascus and Aleppo. As one senior military official has commented, 'Iran's contribution to the conflict could ultimately be a game-changer for the Assad regime.'" http://t.uani.com/ZyarxC

Muhammad Sahimi in The National Interest: "Iran's Guardian Council, the constitutional body that vets the candidates for almost all elections in the country, recently barred Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani from running in the presidential elections of June 14. Rafsanjani, an architect of Iran's 1979 Revolution, is a former two-term president and speaker of the 'Majles' (parliament). Currently he is chairman of the Expediency Discernment Council, which arbitrates disputes between the Majles and the Guardian Council and acts as adviser to the country's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In 1989, Rafsanjani played a key role in elevating Khamenei, then a low-rank cleric, to his Supreme Leader position, and Khamenei repeatedly has referred to Rafsanjani as the 'pillar of the revolution.' Rafsanjani's elimination from the presidential campaign has shocked the nation. Calling it 'unbelievable,' Hassan Khomeini, a grandson of the revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, publicly expressed his anger and said that he had conveyed Qom's major clerics' disapproval to Khamenei. Khomeini's daughter, Dr. Zahra Mostafavi, wrote a letter to Khamenei in which she reminded him of her father's complete trust in Rafsanjani. In another letter to Khamenei, Ali Motahhari, a Majles deputy and son of Ayatollah Morteza Motahhari, an ideologue of the Revolution, said that if Khomeini himself were to run today, the Guardian Council would bar him. Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, who lives in Iraq and is the most important 'Marja,' or source of emulation for the masses, had supported  Rafsanjani's bid for presidency. But Rafsanjani's candidacy had also created a huge wave of support among the common people. This terrifies hardliners afraid  that the Green Movement may come out on the streets again. Repression and crackdown on the reformist activists and supporters of the Green Movement have already increased. Rafsanjani's elimination also represents a significant new development in Iranian politics-namely, the end of the Iranian Revolution of 1979. Although Khamenei is still referred to in Iran as the 'leader of the Islamic revolution,' he now has achieved his long-term goal of transforming Iran into a religio-military dictatorship. To do this, he had to win a fierce power struggle with the moderates, reformists and supporters of the Green Movements, as well as many among the clergy who oppose him, albeit quietly. Before being appointed Supreme Leader, Khamenei had no significant base of support, either in the society or among the grand ayatollahs. When the revolution was gathering steam in the fall of 1978, he did not even belong to Khomeini's inner circle. It was Rafsanjani, a trusted Khomeini disciple, who brought Khamenei into the revolution's high echelons. Due to his low-rank clerical position, Khamenei has never trusted the clerics, except those who have been willing to be absolutely obedient to him. Thus, he has devoted much of his time as Supreme Leader to efforts to consolidate a power base consisting of the security and intelligence forces and the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC)." http://t.uani.com/17DEaZu

Sam Nunberg in Breitbart: "Last September, Seid Hassan Daioleslam, an American of Iranian origins, won a major court victory against the informal Iranian U.S. lobby in Washington. The decision legitimated Mr. Daioleslam's investigative research that exposed the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) and its president, Trita Parsi, as lobbyists for the Iranian regime. But on May 5 M.J. Rosenberg wrote an article that turns upside down the trial outcome and even the facts established in the case. This article points out Rosenberg's many errors. The drama began in 2007 when Mr. Daioleslam, editor of the Iranian American Forum, began to expose NIAC and Parsi's lobbying campaign on behalf of the Iranian Regime, the world's leading sponsor of Islamist terrorism. Seeking to 'hit him hard,' NIAC and Parsi filed their defamation complaint against Mr. Daioleslam in 2008. The Legal Project, an activity of the Middle East Forum, which seeks to protect the right of independent investigative journalists to report freely on Islamist terrorism, coordinated Mr. Daioleslam's pro bono representation by Sidley Austin LLP (Sidley). Senior Litigation Partner Mr. Timothy Kapshandy served as the lead attorney in Mr. Daioleslam's defense. After over five years of litigation, the United States District Court for D.C. not only dismissed the suit against Seid Hassan Daioleslam but also ordered over $183,000 in sanction penalties against NIAC and Parsi for their 'discovery abuses.' Rosenberg works hard to portray this outcome as favorable to NIAC and Parsi, but he fails. Rosenberg claims that '(a)t the end of this five-year process, no evidence was found to substantiate the accusation that NIAC was lobbying for the Iranian regime.' No: the documents produced during discovery, the pre-trial process where parties exchange information in preparation for trial, not only suggest that NIAC was created with the mission to lobby on behalf of the regime, but also suggest that Parsi had arguably been serving the Mullahs' interest in the U.S. since as early as 1997. Rosenberg bemoans the 'tall order' NIAC and Parsi faced in proving their defamation claim in court.  Hardly: Defamation, for public figures, is proven when a false statement is intentionally published with reckless disregard to its truth. NIAC and Parsi's complaint in fact claimed that Mr. Daioleslam 'knew' that his writings were false. However, the complaint 'failed to identify which statements they perceive as defamatory and to put forth specific evidence of actual malice relating to those statements.'  NIAC and Parsi even 'implied at the motions hearing that the summary judgment record did not contain all articles, videos, or other documents that might support their case.'  Not only could they not provide any evidence of Mr. Daioleslam defaming but they also could not prove that any of Mr. Daioleslam's articles were false... Rosenberg's biggest falsehood is the incredulous characterization of the infamous substantial sanction penalty ordered against NIAC and Parsi, describing the $183,000 order as simply 'shifting some of the legal discovery costs.' In reality, NIAC and Parsi were sanctioned by a federal court for malfeasance because it was 'necessary to punish past discovery abuses or deter future abuses.' These abuses included withholding 4,159 calendar appointments from production, concealing 5500 emails with the 'untrue' claim that they did not include agreed upon search terms and attempting to hide office computers and servers. Rosenberg's characterization of the events being that 'NIAC complied' with its discovery requests is a blatant distortion of what actually transpired." http://t.uani.com/11bUCry

Eye on Iran is a periodic news summary from United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) a program of the American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc., a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eye on Iran is not intended as a comprehensive media clips summary but rather a selection of media elements with discreet analysis in a PDA friendly format. For more information please email Press@UnitedAgainstNuclearIran.com

United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI) is a non-partisan, broad-based coalition that is united in a commitment to prevent Iran from fulfilling its ambition to become a regional super-power possessing nuclear weapons.  UANI is an issue-based coalition in which each coalition member will have its own interests as well as the collective goal of advancing an Iran free of nuclear weapons.

No comments:

Post a Comment